Daily
Friday, 19 June 2026
[89981] Storm surrounding Trump's policy toward Iran and political criticism in the Middle East
The Middle East at a Crossroads: Criticism of Trump's Policy Toward Iran
The political and security establishment is in an uproar following the ceasefire deal signed by President Trump with Iran. Among commentators and researchers, there is deep concern that the move is not just a tactical concession, but a dangerous erosion of the United States' status as a reliable ally in the region.
Criticism of the Strategy of Concessions
Eliyahu Ben Asher - The Strategic Foot Soldier defines the American administration's justifications for the agreement as a "genuine horror show." According to him, the arguments of Trump and his vice president, that it was impossible to defeat Iran militarily or economically, sound like "Iranian talking points." Ben Asher warns that presenting the Islamic Republic as unbeatable by the world's greatest superpower could be perceived as a sign of surrender, thereby strengthening Iranian audacity.
A Breach in Regional Trust
On the other hand, Idit Bar - Islam and Arabic with Idit brings the words of Emirati commentator Amjad Taha, who warns that Middle Eastern countries may change their attitude toward Washington. Taha argues that "in the Middle East, loyalty is a hard currency," and clarifies that abandoning Israel in the middle of a battle in favor of deals with Tehran fatally damages American credibility. According to him, "it is possible the big story here is not Iran but the future of alliances in the region," as Arab countries are beginning to consider alternatives to the American defense strategy.
Internal Clash in Israeli Discourse
On the local media level, Gadi Taub: Gatekeeper launched a sharp attack against journalist Ronen Bergman. Taub protests against what he calls a "stream of consciousness of nonsense" and rejects the claim that he previously promoted theories regarding "treason" within the security echelons. Taub emphasizes that his official position has always been focused on criticism of the "concept" that led to the events of October 7th, and that Bergman's attempt to attribute extremist views to him is nothing more than a journalistic obsession that harms Israeli interests in English.