White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt defended President Trump's recent actions against Iran as necessary to prevent an impending attack on the U.S. She asserted that the administration had pre-planned for global energy market disruptions and that Trump will determine when Iran is forced into unconditional surrender.
White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt firmly defended recent U.S. military actions against Iran, characterizing them as a necessary preemptive measure. According to اخبارفوری خبرفوری جنگ امریکا فوری, a Farsi-language Telegram channel heavily focused on breaking alerts regarding U.S.-Iran military conflict, Leavitt stated that Iran wanted to attack the United States and asserted that President Trump wasn't going to sit back and let this happen. Emphasizing the administration's posture, she told reporters that everyone in the room should be grateful for the President's actions and that Trump does not make things up.
The administration also addressed the economic fallout and energy sector volatility resulting from the military engagement. Reporting from خبرفوری ࡆ اخبارفوری مذاکره ࡆ جنگ فوری, a similarly crisis-oriented channel tracking immediate war developments, indicates that the U.S. government was fully prepared for economic retaliation. Leavitt stated that President Trump completely expected the rogue regime of Iran to try and disrupt global markets. Both source channels highlighted Leavitt's claim that Trump and his energy team planned for this scenario long before the strike and moved rapidly to address the temporary disruptions.
Highlighting the administration's maximalist approach, اخبارفوری خبرفوری جنگ امریکا فوری relayed Leavitt's uncompromising conditions for ending the hostilities. She declared that President Trump will determine when Iran is placed in a position of unconditional surrender.
The source messages from both channels present direct Farsi translations of White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's statements without adding native critical commentary, functioning essentially as megaphones for the U.S. administration's talking points despite their Iranian origin. The channels' names reflect a highly sensationalized, crisis-focused editorial stance. Phrases like rogue regime and unconditional surrender accurately reflect the administration's framing as faithfully translated and reported by the Farsi sources.